Recent Photos

    hotSpringbrook National Park LookoutIMG_17742010 philly auto show: mercedes-bens sls amg2010 philly auto show: mercedes-benz sls amg
 

 

Tip for DSLR Beginners: Get a 50mm Lens

Written by: Jeff

“I’m upgrading to a digital SLR. What camera model and lens should I get?” We get asked this often, and our reply is always the same. It matters little what DSLR you have, so long as you’ve got great lenses. And when you’re starting out, there’s really no need to shell out thousands of dollars on lens (unless you have money that you simply must get rid of). We always, always recommend the 50mm. Some of the world’s best photographers have made careers for themselves with the 50mm.

A BIT OF HISTORY

If you bought a 35mm camera during the 70s or 80s then chances are, it came with a 50mm lens. Even Leica rangefinders were bundled with 50mm lenses. The reason for this is that the 50mm perspective approximates that of the human eye, which is also the reason it is called a “normal” lens. Below is a photo of our Canon AE-1 with its 50mm FD f/1.4 lens (taken with our $20 light box and macro studio).


As time went by, the 50mm was replaced with consumer model zoom lenses like the 18-55mm as the starter optic for 35mm cameras and eventually the DSLR. This shift was a marketing strategy employed by camera manufacturers to entice more people into buying their camera. Their selling point was that zoom lenses made taking photos easier since you can change your focal length without moving from your spot. Little did beginners know that image quality was the real price they were paying for the convenience of not walking a few steps to recompose their shot.

THE 50mm TODAY

There is renewed interest in the 50mm lens mainly due to the its price and its speed. With the price of around $80.00, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II is one of the cheapest lens available in the market today followed by Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF Nikkor Lens for about $114.00. You can see that f/1.8 is the maximum aperture of these entry level lenses. It only gets better from here, you can get variants of these lenses at f/1.4 and f/1.2. Canon even makes a 50mm lens at f/1.0 which is the fastest interchangeable lens today. Most pros also say that the 50mm is the sharpest lens ever made because it has been around so long that lens manufacturers have already perfected the process of producing them.


One important note to remember, if you are using a DSLR with a cropped sensor then the 50mm lens’ focal length will change. For those using a 40D, Digital Rebel series, D40 or a D80 which uses an APS-C sensor with a crop factor of 1.6x then a 50mm lens will effectively become an 80mm lens. If you want to have the same perspective as those using a full frame sensor then you can purchase a 28mm or 35mm lens which is close enough to a full frame 50mm.

A DEFINITE GO-TO LENS

We have other lenses, but we find that our 50mm 1.8 is still our go-to lens. It’s plastic and it doesn’t look like much, but it’s fantastic for portraits (it doesn’t enlarge subjects’ noses the way wide angle lenses do), but it’s still wide enough to be handy when we’re out walking. The 1.8 offers a gorgeous bokeh, and faster shutter speeds. The images are clean and sharp. And the best thing about it is that it’s cheap, and works splendidly with available light.

Related Reading:
Lens 101
Tips on How to Take Better Portraits
How to Create Bokeh in Your Photos

Related posts:

  1. Budget Lens Recommendations: Tamron 17-50mm & Sigma 17-70mm
  2. Lens 101
  3. Review: Canon EF 50mm f1.4 USM Lens
  4. Canon EF-S 55-250mm Lens Review
  5. Lens Nomenclature Decoded

Previous Post:

  • Clarity Sage
    I have had my eye on a 50mm lens for a while now. Though I haven't decided if I'm willing to dish out the extra $200 for f/1.4 or if I should just go with f/1.8. Decisions, decisions.


    Great post! I also think a fixed focal lens helps force people to be more creative, making them better photographers because you can't rely on the zoom. Oh, those zooms.
  • Kim - ScrapToMyLu
    found your site through the blogher ad. The 50mm caught my eye since I am a new SLR user. I've been planning on purchasing the 50mm 1.4.......I can't wait.
    Looking forward to exploring your site for much needed information.
  • Lisa
    Clarity Sage, The 1.8's pretty fantastic already, but if you have the extra $200 then why not, right? I totally agree. Zooms have their uses but I love my primes.


    Kim, welcome to BM! :) Glad to have you with us.
  • Ashley
    lisa - my 50 mm f1.8 arrived yesterday and i'm completely in love. you were very right about the 400D kit lens....not that great. i can't wait to explore with my 50 mm. thanks as always for great advice
  • Justin
    I went with Lisa's reasoning and purchased the 1.4. I love the bokeh! And I use it for some event photography for low light. It's very go-to, sturdy build, and great max aperture!
  • Lisa
    Ashley, I remember when I went from kit lens to 50mm. I almost cried with relief. You're welcome! Glad we could help.


    Justin, great to hear. :)
  • GW
    I appreciate your article about 50mm lenses. I have a question for you, for something confuses me a bit. From what a friend at a local camera store told me, a 28mm lens on a DSLR is equivalent to a 50mm on a film SLR. Is this so? So, if I want a good, fast portrait lens, am I better off getting a 28mm or a 50mm? I use a Sony DSLR-A300, and I'm not sure if it has a full frame sensor or not.
  • Jeff
    Hi GW. Your friend is correct in the sense that most DSLRs have a smaller sensor than the conventional 35mm camera which is where crop factors come in.


    For the Sony Alpha 300, it has a crop factor of 1.5x which means that a 50mm lens on it will effectively become 75mm.



    We are not familiar with Sony so I cannot specifically suggest which lens to get, but if it were for a Nikon or Canon user, we would still suggest the 50mm, regardless of sensor size. It's a great piece of glass on both brands.
  • Ivan Berger
    For portraits, 75-100mm is a good range on 35mm film, so a 50mm lens on a Canon DSLR would be good for that. Wide apertures also make it easy to throw backgrounds out of focus, which is very useful in portraiture.
  • Rene
    I purchased a Canon Rebel about a month ago so am an absolute newbie. I am looking to upgrade from my kit lens. One website suggested a 55-250mm IS as being a compatible lens but after reading your blog/comments, I am at a loss as to where to go now. I would like a lens that has good bokeh as I love taking photos of my children, local wildlife and special occasions but don't like being in their faces either. We have an important event coming up that I would like to blow people away with my photos. Any suggestions would be great. I will continue to read the website as it's the best written (easy to understand) one I have come across.
  • GW
    The only thing about a 55-250 is, won't your field of vision be very narrow even at the widest end of the zoom? You may have trouble including many people in each shot. Also, unless the event is going to be outside in great light, you may find yourself challenged by the lighting unless you're talking about a lens with a wide aperture throughout its range.
  • Rene
    GW - It will be in New Zealand in March so I'm guessing it will be inside. I will start with the 50mm and hopefully I will cry with relief after using it just like Lisa almost did. Thanks guys
  • Lisa
    Rene, if you're shooting events, best to get one like the 28-105mm USM. It's about the same price as the 55-250mm, and you have the ability to shoot wide. Shooting an event with a 55-250 should be funny when people ask you to take a group picture. :) GW gave great advice.


    Indoors, the 50mm will perform well. But whether the focal length is wide enough for your purposes, I'm not sure. If it's a small space, you'll need something wider in focal length.
  • Tim
    The "nifty fifty" was the first accessory I bought for my 400D. I don't think I remember how to take it off! ;o)
  • Nancy LC
    This article was GREAT! It makes me want to try it.


    I have a new Canon Rebel Xsi and I was wondering if the focal length issue was the same as that camera you mentioned in your article? I looked at the spec and it says:



    "It’s an APS-C size sensor (22.2 x 14.8mm), and there’s an effective 1.6x increase in the lens’s marked focal length when attached"



    So I take it I'd probably need a 28mm or 35mm to actually achieve 50mm?



    I'm a newbie and the terminology has me a little confused at times (to say the least).
  • Jeff
    Hey, Nancy! You have an APS-C size sensor so yep. Either 28mm or 35mm would get you closer to a true 50mm. But if you shoot more portraits, go for the 35mm.
  • Jeff
    And also, no worries about the confusion with terminologies. We all start there anyway.
  • Curtis
    Hi Lisa,


    I have a Oly E-520, and for a while wanted the Sigma 1.4 EX DG HSM, or the zuiko 2.0 50mm.



    The Sigma would be nice for the large aperture and large 77mm diameter, until the price of the filter is almost the same price as a 50mm lens for other cameras.



    I have been using a telephoto for a while now and i am wishing i had purchased a 50mm like you mention here.



    I know a 50mm is a lot more versatile to use. I went to Oregon and wish i had a 50mm with me.
  • Johnny D.
    Wow! This is really great site! Thank you very much for the time and effort.


    As redundant as it sounds, I'm a newbie as well! Just purchased the Canon Xsi and I have 1 question on the telephoto lens and if Lisa or anyone can help, that would be great!



    For specifically shooting sport photos (indoors and out), which lens would be appropriate? I know that cost is an issue, so any suggestions for a low cost/high end lens would be great (if that exists haha)



    Thank you!
  • Yoon
    Dear all,
    Thank you to all for posting such a fruitful knowhow in this page.



    Regarding to the Full Frame and APS-C sensor topic, I am looking for a 50mm lense for my D60, which is with a APS-C sensor. From the previous discussion I understand that to be able to achieve actual 50mm, I should buy a 35mm lense.

    However, i am struggling now what if in future I change a full frame camera?



    For anyone who have the experience, can get me a piece of advice?
  • Jeff
    @Johnny D.


    The only low cost telephoto lens we have experience with is the Canon 55-250mm IS f/4-5.6. It produces great photos and the price isn't that bad. The only problem is that that it's a fairly slow lens. You probably will not get good shots if the sporting event you are shooting is indoors unless the venue is brightly lit. Your only option for covering indoor events is buying a fast telephoto and we all know those do not come cheap.



    @Yoon



    If you're really thinking about upgrading to a full frame camera in the future then I suggest that you just buy a 50mm lens right now. On an APS-C camera, your effective focal length would be around 80mm which would still be perfect for portrait shots. Besides, the 50mm isn't expensive at all and you get great optics.
blog comments powered by Disqus