Recent Photos

    hotSpringbrook National Park LookoutIMG_17742010 philly auto show: mercedes-bens sls amg2010 philly auto show: mercedes-benz sls amg
 

 

IS THIS A GOOD PICTURE?

Written by: vernons

A little something about judging a photograph…

When you look at a photograph, how do you decide whether you like it or not? Ask yourself this question – is this a good picture? And consciously or subconsciously your mind tries to answer many questions that help’s it answer the first one.

Judging whether a work of art is good or not, is a very subjective thing. Different people, with time, develop different tastes and different sets of rules with regard to what they look for in a work of art. The same is also the case with photography. If you’ve ever read in a magazine, a judge’s views when judging a photo contest, you’ll know that there are a number of preset qualities that they are looking for in the pictures. So if your picture doesn’t satisfy all those presets, it won’t be considered good enough. But that very picture could be one of the best in another judge’s view, simply because his criteria for judging are totally different. It is then very clear, that a picture looking good or not so good is all very relative… relative to the views of the people looking at it. But as a generalization one can judge a picture on two aspects.

The first is the technical aspect. How technically sound a picture is, depends on the way different aspects of a picture have been used.

Focus and sharpness: This is something I was taught by a very experienced photographer. E said, “Sharpness is the key to a good picture”. A picture that is not sharp doesn’t invite any attention. Obviously, if you can’t even see the subject clearly, then what’s the point of the picture?
About focus. Focus is used differently in different situations. Street photography, for example, requires as much of the frame as possible to be in focus. So do landscapes. Wildlife photography however often calls for a blurred background, in order to eliminate the distraction caused by the backdrop and focus the viewer’s attention to the subject. This is done because wildlife backgrounds are mostly a clutter of distracting leaves and branches. So what and how much is in focus affects the impact the picture has on the viewer.

Exposure: Does the picture show you all that it’s meant to? The shadows, the highlights… the dark and the light? All these factors come into play when you set the exposure for an image. It takes good technique and quite a bit of experience to get the right exposure. In fact, most of the research in the photography industry is targeted towards equipment that allows you to get proper exposure in low light without compromising the sharpness.

Some questions you should ask yourself are: Are the highlights burned out? Are the shadows too dark? Are the colours nice and saturated? Is there too much noise? Do you like the tonal range and variation?

The final element that decides the ‘fate’ of a picture is the composition. The frame, the subject, the angle, the elements in the picture: These are the ingredients that mix to form the wonderful recipe that is a photograph.

Composition again is led by certain general guidelines like the rule of the thirds, leading lines, etc. But out of focus, exposure and composition, composition is the most subjective. One sure question – does the composition take your attention to the subject or away from it?

This takes care of the technicals, and brings us to my favourite part – the message. They say that a picture is worth a thousand words, and I more than agree. For me, personally, the message conveyed by the photo comes before anything else – the mood captured, the mood conveyed. A photography legend once said, “For me, a good picture is one that makes me saw wow”. Do I need to say anything else?

As you grow as a photographer you’ll develop an instinct of sorts (regarding the elements of a good photograph) which will become second nature to you, and what you look for in a picture will show in the pictures you take. In the end, I just want to say that there is no right or wrong about a picture (except the technical aspect). It is what you like or don’t like, what you would do differently and what the picture says to you that matters.

So just for fun, I’m posting two pictures and invite all of you, our fabulous readers, to tell me what you think about them 

 

Ride like the wind..

Sunbath?

 

 

I’ve purposely left the pictures without a description because I want to know what YOU think when you look at them. I look forward to your comments and critique.

EDIT: Thanks to Ilan, he reminded me of something very important that got left out. What makes a picture stand out from the crowd? – Originality. The rules are there as a basic guideline, to guide you as you start out. But as you learn more and grow, you develop your own characteristic style which is different from the others. And it is this difference that gives you and your pictures a photographic identity. Break the rules (“in the right way”) – dare to be different – experiment – not as a necessity, but only if you or the picture demand it be done. Make a statement with your photos. Afterall they’re your photos!

Related posts:

  1. 100 Steps to IYP – Lesson 11 – Breaking the rules..
  2. 100 Steps to IYP – Lesson 8 – Assignments and Critique
  3. Breaking the Rules of Photography
  4. Composition Tips – Balance
  5. Inspiring Emotion – Technical or Talent?

Previous Post:

  • Interesting post.
    You wrote the basic guidelines for a beginner but I think it's also important to note that learning to break the basic rules in the right way - That's what makes a good photographer at the end.
    And I have a good example - Check Flickr's "Interestingness" pool. 99.9% of the photo are very sharp, are nicely exposed, great colors, great composition etc etc etc. They have a high "WOW" factor, but after 30 minutes you start to get bored. They are all the same eventually.
    And most of them, are pretty easy to "reproduce".
    Now, check "Magnums" gallery, or in-public.com. THAT'S good photography. That's art.
    I must admit. My views are more "street photography" oriented. And maybe I'm wrong, I mean, surely "my rules" don't apply on fashion photography and such.

    When I began my photography explorations, I found few people whom I thought were good photographers in the area of my interest. And they were. Not the best in their field maybe, but with lots of experience. I showed them my works, and I learned from their critiques. I bought books of the Masters and I was inspired by them. That's how, slowly, I learned to decided whether my photos are good or bad.

    Of course, I'm not even close to become good at this. I'm will learn and hopefully become better and better with time.

    I got carried away a bit, hope my opinion didn't offend you, I think the article is great - it's made me write all this :)
  • I am unable to view the full photo(s) because the right-hand nav bar overlaps the photos
  • The horse and rider I like because of the motion. The initial focal point for me is the color of the rider. My eye then goes to the open mouth of the horse, it must be working so hard. I like off balanced shots like this. It may not be the most clear shot on the planet, but it is very interesting and show the intensity between the horse and rider.

    The second is very clean and simple. Uniform color and clarity. I like it for its simplicity. Again offset, I like that.

    I am such a beginner at this, I like both of these photos for different reasons.

    I feel a good picture differs with each individual. Everyone will have an opinion.
  • Rambling1on
    Saw your tweet and came here to have a look. I like! ;-)
    I am a new Nikon digital SLR owner..just upgraded a few months ago from the venerable point'n'shoot.
    I have an 18-200 lens I am using instead of the kit lens (D40) and when I get better and deserve it, I will get a macro. I seem to be into landscapes mostly.

    My fave of yours above? The leaf. The textures called to me among other things.

    Tweet ya later.
  • The color of the first photo caught my eye, and then I, too, moved to the horse's open mouth. I like that there was space for the horse/rider to go.

    I really like the second picture. It's warm and simple. The lines in the sand seem to point to the leaf. I love leaves, and the echo of the curves in the leaf and sand are great. I also like that little curl at the very tip of the leaf. It looks like the leaf falls into the rule of thirds position.

    Great article. Thank you. I'm a newbie and am very interested in what makes a picture stand out from the crowd.
  • You got a tweet?! :)
    I can't see find your tweet name anywhere on this site!
  • Hi all, thank you for your comments! Thats the best part about blogging.. its sharing of knowledge and you get to learn a lot from others!

    @Ilan - You're absolutely right Ilan. One aspect that I was supposed to include, but somehow forgot to, was Originality. I will edit the post to incorporate that as well :) And no I'm not at all offended by your post, in fact I'm very happy to see that you could relate to it and that it made you write such a looong comment! And of course we got a tweet! Our tweet is 'beyondmegapixel' (without the 's')

    @Corina - Everything seems to be in order here. If you're still having problems, try changing your screen resolution (increase it) or use a different browser :)

    @Blair - I like how you saw the intensity of the 'ride'. These guys were indeed VERY fast. This picture is special to me because this is from my first attempt at panning. I had seen a panning shot of a bullock cart race during the Rural Olympics of India, and I'd said to myself, "One day dude.. I'll take a better picture than this one", and I was delighted when I got this shot. This was thanks to a photographer from the European Press-photo Agency (EPA) who took me along and showed me how.

    And I agree, everyone has their opinion. Thats what makes it all the more exciting :)

    @Rambling1on - You know, to be honest, I never looked very carefully at the leaf photo. I mean I never tried to analyse it. I just saw the leaf lying there and just looking at it gave me an odd feeling inside. It was looking so beautiful. And if you're more into landscapes, you might want to think about getting a fast wide angle lens rather than a macro. What you're using now will also do, but if you want a dedicated lens for landscapes, then a wide angle is what you're looking for.

    @Neuroknitter - I'm glad you liked the article and the picture. And I'm also glad to see that you notice the little things like the curled tip. Sometimes such little things can make a big difference to the picture without being obvious. And for what makes a picture stand out, read the edit at the end of the post :)
  • "There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs." -Ansel Adams

    "I’m always amused by the idea that certain people have about technique, which translate into an immoderate taste for the sharpness of the image. It is a passion for detail, for perfection, or do they hope to get closer to reality with this trompe I’oeil? They are, by the way, as far away from the real issues as other generations of photographers were when they obscured their subject in soft-focus effects." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
  • The running horse fits all the classic criteria for a very good picture, but still is enough different from the typical racehorse shot to keep my interest. The horse and rider are sharp in the right places to show the effort of the horse and the detail of the costume. The rest of the shot shows the speed and action by blur. That panning is a very difficult technique well done. The composition fits the "rule of thirds." Mr. Singh leaves much more room in front of the horse than in back, leaving him plenty of room to run and stay in the frame.

    When I really look at the second picture, I have to laugh. By itself it bugs me terribly as being off balance, very heavy in the right, with the end of the leaf leading straight out of the picture. But I love it anyway. It's not by itself; it mimics the picture above it. It too is obviously technically proficient. The leaf is in sharp focus, and the background texture is beautifully handled. The body of the leaf is in much the same place as the body of the horse, and the shadow takes attention and lends balance in much the same way as the crowd. What sets these two images apart and makes one seem balanced and the other off is the movement. The horse is moving into the empty space and so the viewer feels it will soon be filled and isn't bothered. The leaf, however, points away from the image and out of the frame, while the image as a whole is very still and quiet. I think one detail left out of what makes a picture good is its fitness for its purpose. As an image to compare to the running horse, this leaf shot is excellent. Nicely done!
  • Call me crazy . . . the horse and rider - in a time warp of sorts heading for the next dimension.

    The leaf, like a lonely snail inching across the Sahara.
  • Irene
    I'm a sucker for both of these kinds of pictures: action and nature, specially, macro shots of little flowers.

    I love the leaf, and how the lighting has made the sand almost the same color as the leaf. The detail of the leaf's veins, the curling of the edges. So defined! Even the shadow provides such an interesting contrast, because it looks like it's a shadow of something standing up instead of something dying.

    And the racehorse and jockey. So that's panning? (i read the comments). AWESOME!! Technically perfect (someone else already wrote it here, so I won't anymore), so I'll just react: AWESOME!!! ^_^
blog comments powered by Disqus